Showing posts with label judicial. Show all posts
Showing posts with label judicial. Show all posts

Saturday, July 10, 2021

Chicago Tonight: Judge Timothy Evans responds to blame on courts for crime spike

 

[VIDEO] Since he was mentioned in the comments on this blog we hear from Chief Cook County Judge Timothy Evans on Chicago Tonight who answering to the criticism of Mayor Lori Lightfoot and Supt. David Brown as far as the recent spike in crime. The Mayor and Supt believes the courts aren't upholding their part in upholding the law even as police officers are taking people charged with murder off the street.

Monday, March 3, 2014

A flyer for a Cook County judicial candidate

Some of us got some flyers hanging on our doors and gates. The flyer you see above was attached to a door hanger that advertized candidates for Water Reclamation District, however we shall see that sometime in the future.

This flyer is for a judicial candidate, you see Neville vacancy on the flyer however most of us who are unfamiliar with the judicial system in Cook County probably has no idea what this means. Well according to the blog For What It's Worth, William "Bill" Raines is seeking a countywide judicial office.

And you can visit his campaign website www.billrainesforjudge.com


Tuesday, January 14, 2014

AP: Judge gives Chicago 6 months to OK gun sales law

An update to a couple of posts done here on this subject about a court ruling that deemed a Chicago ordinance banning gun sales in the city illegal:
A federal judge on Tuesday approved Chicago's request for a delay of six months to allow the city time to craft a new gun sales ordinance.

Federal Judge Edward E. Chang approved the 180-day delay. Chang had ruled Jan. 6 that the city's ban on gun sales was unconstitutional, and Monday was deadline for the city appeal the ruling.

Instead, Mayor Rahm Emanuel's administration decided to seek the six month delay in its implementation, rather than fight Chang's ruling.

Monday was the last day for the city to appeal the ruling, but in yet another example of the city's recognition that it cannot keep guns out of the hands of its residents, attorneys instead filed a motion asking for the 180 days "to enact reasonable and comprehensive regulations governing firearms sales and transfers that will protect public safety while also respecting Second Amendment rights."
...
 The city said it needed the six months to allow gun sales because any ordinance will "have many detailed components, including zoning, licensing, and operational requirements for gun dealers, as well as robust regulations targeting illegal sales and transfer practices ..." The motion also said it will take time for the City Council to enact an ordinance.
PREVIOUS POSTS

Tuesday, November 29, 2011

Former Ald. Lyle appointed to the county circuit court...

UPDATED 9:09 - I was just alerted to the comments in the article from the Tribune about Judge Lyle's appointment to the Cook County bench. A lot of people aren't very happy about this. Although I share this knowing that some have expressed comments supporting her appointment to the bench.

Worlee posted on his blog last night that former Ald. Lyle is to be appointed a circuit court judge in Cook County to fill a vacancy on the second subcircut of Cook County that was originally filled by Michael Stuttley. The Tribune tells us more about Lyle's future plans as a judge:
“I am proud to serve the community in a new area, and it keeps my intellectual juices flowing,” Lyle said of her appointment, adding that she does not plan to run in the March primary for judge but would consider filling another vacancy if one opened up.
It's also expected that she will give up her position as the attorney for the city council's Black Caucus within the next week. In her capacity with the Black Caucus she had been working on the remap effort.

Friday, October 28, 2011

Cops not distributed equitably across city, ACLU says in lawsuit

Chicago is a city of haves and have-nots when it comes to police protection, according to a lawsuit filed Thursday.

The American Civil Liberties Union of Illinois sued in Cook County Circuit Court, saying the city is failing to deploy cops equitably across the city’s neighborhoods.

The number of backlogged 911 calls is unevenly large in neighborhoods with the biggest minority populations, the lawsuit said.

“Disproportionate numbers of delays in 911 calls have a devastating effect on a neighborhood,” said Harvey Grossman, an ACLU attorney.

On Thursday, Mayor Rahm Emanuel said he understands the basis for the lawsuit. But he said he’s sought to add resources to high-crime districts since he took office.

“We’re ahead of where we were on May 15. We’re not done applying our resources — by holding commanders accountable or applying manpower. But it is not just manpower alone.”
You think this lawsuit is worthwhile. Could it result in more police on this part of town?

Monday, January 24, 2011

UPDATE: Emanuel off the ballot for Mayor

UPDATED 6:26 PM Emanuel files an emergency motion to stay the Appellate Court Ruling pending appeal via Capitol Fax.

You can read this story from the NY Times.

You also can read a round-up of consequences from the Capitol Fax.

It makes you wonder doesn't it? Who wants Rahm Emanuel off the ballot? To be honest I haven't really been paying attention to this story as I already knew that the Chicago Board of Election voted in Emanuel's favor. I knew about the court case as well, but this for some was an unexpected ruling.

All that can be said was well I was glad to see him take a stand on the Red Line extension, but it doesn't do him much good if he's no longer on the ballot.

Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Showdown in handgun ban

However the US Supreme Court will decide this issue may well affect us in the City of Chicago.

I want to expose my bias here. I would support any attempt to take aim at the handgun ban as I support the 2nd Amendment. Banning guns doesn't necessarily make citizens safer as it is my belief that there are those citizens who would disregard any gun ban for their own aims mainly criminal aims. Law abiding citizens should have the right if they so choose to own and possess a gun on the confines of their own property.

That being said here's a report from FOX Chicago on a grandfather from Morgan Park who is the lead plaintiff in the Supreme Court case on Chicago's gun ban:


Here's another article from Greg Hinz at Crain's Chicago Business:
Look for a big crowd —and some verrry contentious debate — on Tuesday morning when the U.S. Supreme Court hears oral arguments on whether to overturn Chicago's ordinance banning most private possession of handguns in the city.

The 30-year-old measure has intense local support. Not only Mayor Richard M. Daley but four area members of Congress joined Chicago police chief Jody Weis on Monday at a press conference defending the law.

But most insiders expect the court to veto the law as it overturned a similar statute in Washington, D.C., a year ago. The only real question likely is how far the court goes to affect related laws, such as measures limiting who can carry concealed weapons on the street.
This is also of note from that piece:
As Mr. Daley put it, "Cities and states should be able to decide for themselves how to protect their citizens."
Well while I think I should be allowed to own a handgun at home, I can't disagree with that. The question that should be answered is how far should a city or state go in banning guns? Should there be a total ban allowed or can it be decided that gun owners shouldn't own certain types of guns?

There are those strict constructionists who believe in the text of the 2nd Amendment which says:
A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed.
I understand that people will look at the term "militia" and then assume that this means a collective right. That you have to sign up for the Reserves or the National Guard or something like that in order to bear arms. Indeed there are those who have more trust in military or police to handle guns in our society. Although there are those who may have little faith or trust in our military personnel or the police to handle their weapons and their authority to use arms.

If I was to read that literally I see a distinction between the people versus a militia. If it's a collective right as written and adopted not long after the 1789 ratification of the US Constitution (the Bill of Rights including the 2nd Amendment was adopted in 1791) then why mention the people at all. Surely there is a decent explanation for that even if it's in some past definition of terms as the English has evolved since 1789.

BTW, I want to note the Chicago Tribune. On my own blog I wrote about Mr. McDonald bouncing off of a Tribune article from January:
Amid the clamor of the gun-rights debate, McDonald presents a strongly sympathetic figure: an elderly man who wants a gun to protect himself from the hoodlums preying upon his neighborhood. But the story of McDonald and his lawsuit is more complicated than its broad outlines might suggest. McDonald and three co-plaintiffs were carefully recruited by gun-rights groups attempting to shift the public perception of the Second Amendment as a white, rural Republican issue. McDonald, a Democrat and longtime hunter, jokes that he was chosen as lead plaintiff because he is African-American.

And no matter what the court — and the public — might make of his story or his case, legal experts say McDonald is poised to become an enduring symbol.

"Regardless of how this case goes, Mr. McDonald's name is set in legal history, at the same level as Roe v. Wade and Plessy v. Ferguson," said Nicholas Johnson, a law professor at Fordham University. "Schoolkids are going to recognize that in this case, something dramatic happened."
Read the whole thing while it's still available. It's a good story.

I also want to note that in the Republican gubernatorial primary, the entire field supports concealed carry in our state. Illinois and Wisconsin are the only two states in the union where concealed carry isn't the law. The presumed Republican nominee for Governor, Bill Brady, is on record as supporting concealed carry in Illinois. 

As always comments are always appreciated. Let's hear your thoughts on whether or not you support gun control or a gun ban in the city. If the Supreme Court overturns Chicago's gun ban ordinances how do YOU think it will affect Chicago.

Friday, June 5, 2009

Another Useless Judge

This caught my eye at 2nd City Cop. PROFANITY WARNING!
Today at branch 50 Judge Ann O'Donnell truley demonstrated she does not give a fuck about the police. In a case where a female offender pulled and pointed a loaded gun at a police officer. The judge found probable cause, but reduced bail because the family couldn't raise enough to get her out for her graduation. and with the state objecting. The judge thought it was more important to let a potential cop killer go to graduation and reduced the bond. It makes me sick as well as all the officers present. Please get this out to all the readers. This judge has no business being a judge.

Thank you
I would say that this young lady shouldn't have had bail reduced especially since this case could have resulted in murder. The message on this should be clear. That's just my opinion however.

A reason why we should watch those judges!

Thursday, April 2, 2009

Former Gov. Blagojevich indicted!

Watching Gov. Pat Quinn respond to the indictment.

Relevant links are to be posted here!

Round-up from the Capitol Fax including the published indictment.

A Newsalert flashback with regards Blagojevich's shady past.

Illinoize: ICPR and reform leaders react to Blago indictment

Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion: Blago meets RICO

Marathon Pundit: Burris says he's not a target in upcoming Blago indictment

Clout St: Scandal-plagued state pension boards to get overhaul

Video: CBS2 legal analyst on Blagojevich indictment

Sun-Times: Blagojevich, brother among six indicted

AP: Ill. GOP chairman: Democrats empowered Blagojevich

WREX.com: Key points in Blagojevich's time as Ill. governor

Monday, November 3, 2008

Making Sense of All the Judges on the Ballot

Listen to this segment from CPR. This is another idea for a post as well. After the election though. But you can read this post on the subject as well.

Also from CPR, How Do Voters Choose Which Judges to Retain?

Thursday, October 30, 2008

RE: Progressive Advocacy on Cook County Judges

An earlier comment from this post :
All of these Judges are Black. Is the Alderman in support of removing them from their seats?
Response from the Alderman who said she's been busy with the Hudson murders and City Hall budget hearings:
The recommendations I made and passed out on a sample ballot encourage the voters to vote for each of these Black Judges.  It is always interesting to see the main stream media routinely recommend and endorse Judges who are disrespectful to Black litigants, abusive to Black lawyers, and generally unwilling or too lazy to keep abreast of the changes in the law.  As a result I usually discount most of their recommendation regarding Black Judges.  While there is at least one Black Judge on my list that needs to work on their performance those shortcomings are not sufficient to call for that person's removal from the bench.
There you have it!

Wednesday, October 29, 2008

Ballot includes votes for judges

Defender:
Voters casting ballots for county, state and federal lawmakers in the General Election on Nov. 4 are reminded to continue towards the end of the ballot and vote for 70 nonpartisan judges looking to fill or retain judgeships.

Because judges do not have opponents, voters must cast a “yes” or “no” vote. Each judge seeking retention must receive at least a 60 percent “yes” vote to remain on the bench.

Retention judges preside over thousands of cases filed each year in Cook County. The cases include issues challenging the judicial system, child custody, criminal matters and divorce.

Among the 64 judges rated “Qualified” by the Chicago Bar Association are Diane Gordon Cannon, Sharon Johnson Coleman and Shelli Williams-Hayes.

Friday, October 10, 2008

Blaming Cook County Judges

CPR:
Federal Court Judge Virginia Kendall said Cook County's central bond court is a mess, that's where suspects have their first hearing after arrest. Civil rights attorney Locke Bowman agrees that county judges are dropping the ball there.

BOWMAN: They have the frontline responsibility to make the decision who stays in jail awaiting trial and who doesn't. They are doing an abysmal job performing that function.

Bowman says the judges are just locking everyone up. He says they need to identify defendants who don't pose a threat and release them, that would eliminate persistent overcrowding at the jail. Bowman and attorneys for the people who run the jail say the state judiciary has been unresponsive to their requests to sit down and figure out a solution to overcrowding.

Chief Judge Timothy Evans says he's all for beefing up pre-trial services, the division that would identify harmless defendants who could be released while awaiting trial. He says he's asked the county board for funding but plans to move ahead regardless.

Thursday, June 26, 2008

ISRA files suit against Chicago in Federal Court

In light of the DC v Heller decision of the US Supreme Court this morning the Illinois State Rifle Association has filed suit against the City of Chicago. Directly from their homepage...
The Illinois State Rifle Association, together with Second Amendment Foundation and several individual plaintiffs, filed suit against the City of Chicago in federal court this morning at 9:15 CDT. More information will be made available in a statement from the attorneys tomorrow.
Via The Capitol Fax in this post with a great discussion about this decision and the role of the courts in interpreting the law. Some might say legislating from the bench or judicial activism but I'm sure there are some court followers who have their own opinions on that.

When the ruling came down apparently Mayor Daley has been promising to fight any attempts to overturn Chicago's handgun ban enacted in 1982. There are stories contained in both the Capitol Fax post and the ISRA's homepage. This article with Daley talking about this Supreme Court decision it seem that Daley is rambling more than usual.

I also want to note a pro 2nd Amendment rally that will be held at the Thompson Center on July 11th. That is for those of you who might be interested in that.

I don't want to go on and on about it but I would like to see if there are any comments on this at all. Perhaps I'll see what other Chicago area bloggers might be saying about this ruling as well.

Wednesday, June 4, 2008

Participate in Local Government - Sue your Home Town!

A very cynical post from the Broken Heart of Roger's Park. One example provided what how citizen got together to stop a private school and the Chicago Park District from taking a piece of parkland.

Sunday, March 2, 2008

Customs Law: All Politics is Local

Something to consider although this post is just about two months old. I wonder if anyone out there has any gripes about how they choose their county judges. I've heard a few over the years.

Addition: Perhaps Illinois should try the Missouri Plan.

Sunday, January 27, 2008

Don't know anything about the judges on the ballots?

Check out this blog, For What It's Worth, where they talk about the various judges running for election in this cycle. Of course the coverage is throughout Cook County but I'm sure we can look at a sample ballot and determine which judges are running for the subdistrict for our area. Of course there are also judges running countywide as well. I almost wished they'd change the way judges are chosen. I wish there was a more appointment process involved than judges running for election.